Enacademic 🎓Analogindex
49 subscribers
77.3K photos
5 videos
249K links
Download Telegram
Just your typical billionaire threatening to murder anyone who disagrees with him. Totally normal and sane.

submitted by /u/CrJ418 to r/WhitePeopleTwitter link comments
Read more...
“You won’t be harmed by childbirth”

submitted by /u/MelanieWalmartinez to r/facepalm link comments
Read more...
*Star Wars Undertakes Universe-Shaking Changes After ‘Ahsoka’ | Dave Filoni now Chief Creative Officer at Lucasfilm*

submitted by /u/indig0sixalpha to r/StarWars [link] [comments]
[Read more...](https://www.reddit.com/r/StarWars/comments/180mxj2/star_wars_undertakes_universeshaking_changes/)
Star Wars Undertakes Universe-Shaking Changes After ‘Ahsoka’ | Dave Filoni now Chief Creative Officer at Lucasfilm

submitted by /u/indig0sixalpha to r/StarWars link comments
Read more...
Hasan defends his use of racial slurs and calls out Destiny

submitted by /u/MiserableSnow to r/LivestreamFail link comments
Read more...
*AITA for accepting my daughter's request for me to walk her down the aisle and fill in for a mother/daughter dance at her wedding when my husband has been her stepdad since she was 10?*

I lost my first husband when our children Calla (24f) and Hawthorn (26m) were 6 and 8 years old. I remarried 4 years later. I met my husband a year after losing my late husband, we were friends for several months, dated some, stronger feelings developed and I introduced him to the kids to see how they would get along, we halted for a year while my kids and I did some therapy because their reaction to my husband was strongly negative, because they didn't want to replace their dad. But once therapy was ongoing they were doing better. From there things moved faster but the kids were on board for things to move on. They were clear, however, that my husband was not going to be filling the role of a dad in their lives. My husband said he was fine with that as long as he was respected and they could work toward being caring family. Calla and I were always close but she was a real daddy's girl. Losing her dad was extremely tough for her. She did form a nice relationship with my husband but it comes nowhere close to the bond she had with her dad. From the age of 12 she and I became much closer. I think my parenting style as well as my willingness to talk about her dad even after I remarried made me someone she felt she could be open with. She was 15 when she told me if she ever got married she would want me to walk her down the aisle and for us to do a mother/daughter dance instead of a father/daughter one. I told her we could dance to the song her dad used to sing to her. She said she loved the idea. Even though she seemed to mean it, I always assumed things would change when she got older. I figured she would choose to walk alone, with her brother as a representation of her dad and their close relationship as well as for the societal expectation for a man to do it, or with her husband. But when she got engaged three weeks ago she asked me right away. She brought up our past conversation and told me she wanted exactly that. I told her I would be honored. We cried tears of joy together. I told her that her dad would be so proud. My husband took the news in a way I did not expect. His first question was whether I suggested she ask us both to do it and I told him no. Then he asked if she ever considered asking him and I said I could not answer that for her. He asked me if I thought of him when I said yes. He asked whether I gave any thought to all he has done for Calla, for both kids, and the fact he's still not looked upon as a fatherly figure all these years later. I told him I did not think of him when asked because I was overjoyed. He told me I should have given him a lot more consideration and I should have tried to compromise with my daughter. I thought he would change his stance but now three weeks on and he feels I was wrong. He told me he felt he deserved more from all of us, but especially me. He said I am his wife. I should be working on making sure he is respected and honored for his contribution to the kids' lives. AITA? submitted by /u/PopShort7064 to r/AmItheAsshole [link] [comments]
[Read more...](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmItheAsshole/comments/180ppnn/aita_for_accepting_my_daughters_request_for_me_to/)
AITA for accepting my daughter's request for me to walk her down the aisle and fill in for a mother/daughter dance at her wedding when my husband has been her stepdad since she was 10?

I lost my first husband when our children Calla (24f) and Hawthorn (26m) were 6 and 8 years old. I remarried 4 years later. I met my husband a year after losing my late husband, we were friends for several months, dated some, stronger feelings developed and I introduced him to the kids to see how they would get along, we halted for a year while my kids and I did some therapy because their reaction to my husband was strongly negative, because they didn't want to replace their dad. But once therapy was ongoing they were doing better. From there things moved faster but the kids were on board for things to move on. They were clear, however, that my husband was not going to be filling the role of a dad in their lives. My husband said he was fine with that as long as he was respected and they could work toward being caring family. Calla and I were always close but she was a real daddy's girl. Losing her dad was extremely tough for her. She did form a nice relationship with my husband but it comes nowhere close to the bond she had with her dad. From the age of 12 she and I became much closer. I think my parenting style as well as my willingness to talk about her dad even after I remarried made me someone she felt she could be open with. She was 15 when she told me if she ever got married she would want me to walk her down the aisle and for us to do a mother/daughter dance instead of a father/daughter one. I told her we could dance to the song her dad used to sing to her. She said she loved the idea. Even though she seemed to mean it, I always assumed things would change when she got older. I figured she would choose to walk alone, with her brother as a representation of her dad and their close relationship as well as for the societal expectation for a man to do it, or with her husband. But when she got engaged three weeks ago she asked me right away. She brought up our past conversation and told me she wanted exactly that. I told her I would be honored. We cried tears of joy together. I told her that her dad would be so proud. My husband took the news in a way I did not expect. His first question was whether I suggested she ask us both to do it and I told him no. Then he asked if she ever considered asking him and I said I could not answer that for her. He asked me if I thought of him when I said yes. He asked whether I gave any thought to all he has done for Calla, for both kids, and the fact he's still not looked upon as a fatherly figure all these years later. I told him I did not think of him when asked because I was overjoyed. He told me I should have given him a lot more consideration and I should have tried to compromise with my daughter. I thought he would change his stance but now three weeks on and he feels I was wrong. He told me he felt he deserved more from all of us, but especially me. He said I am his wife. I should be working on making sure he is respected and honored for his contribution to the kids' lives. AITA? submitted by /u/PopShort7064 to r/AmItheAsshole link comments
Read more...
*If Alabama has an argument over Texas after losing by 10 at home, wouldn’t Georgia have an argument over Alabama in a close loss in the SEC title game?*

Notes - head to head apparently only matters if it’s recent? Recency bias is a bit of a logical fallacy, but the argument how a team is playing now is more relevant than how they played week 2 is, imo, a valid one. Look at Ohio state in 2014 who lost to 6-6 Virginia tech then proceeded to beat the sec champion and pac 12 champ to win the title. would Alabama struggling against auburn or Georgia struggling against Georgia tech come into play? The ideal for sec fans is that both make it of course. But what if both play poorly the week before, and fsu/Washington both run the table. Do people think the big ten champ or an undefeated P5 will be left out in place of a second sec team? if head to head doesn’t matter, shouldn’t where they played the game at least matter? Imagine team A at home losing by 10 at home and team b losing on a neutral site by a field goal with time expiring. The latter is quite clearly better. Texas should get in with a ooc win over Alabama and a big xii title. Will the committee choose to ignore head to head and weigh conference titles, while then also citing head to head to justify Alabama going over Georgia? The mental gymnastics here and how it may be a large factor to determine champion makes this sport a lot more like figure skating than the NFL submitted by /u/Collegefootballisfun to r/CFB [link] [comments]
[Read more...](https://www.reddit.com/r/CFB/comments/180q8if/if_alabama_has_an_argument_over_texas_after/)
If Alabama has an argument over Texas after losing by 10 at home, wouldn’t Georgia have an argument over Alabama in a close loss in the SEC title game?

Notes - head to head apparently only matters if it’s recent? Recency bias is a bit of a logical fallacy, but the argument how a team is playing now is more relevant than how they played week 2 is, imo, a valid one. Look at Ohio state in 2014 who lost to 6-6 Virginia tech then proceeded to beat the sec champion and pac 12 champ to win the title. would Alabama struggling against auburn or Georgia struggling against Georgia tech come into play? The ideal for sec fans is that both make it of course. But what if both play poorly the week before, and fsu/Washington both run the table. Do people think the big ten champ or an undefeated P5 will be left out in place of a second sec team? if head to head doesn’t matter, shouldn’t where they played the game at least matter? Imagine team A at home losing by 10 at home and team b losing on a neutral site by a field goal with time expiring. The latter is quite clearly better. Texas should get in with a ooc win over Alabama and a big xii title. Will the committee choose to ignore head to head and weigh conference titles, while then also citing head to head to justify Alabama going over Georgia? The mental gymnastics here and how it may be a large factor to determine champion makes this sport a lot more like figure skating than the NFL submitted by /u/Collegefootballisfun to r/CFB link comments
Read more...