Enacademic 🎓Analogindex
49 subscribers
77.3K photos
5 videos
249K links
Download Telegram
*How to Finally Get That Mildew Smell Out of Your Towels*

A cleaning pro shares their step-by-step process. READ MORE...
[Read more...](https://www.apartmenttherapy.com/how-to-get-mildew-smell-out-of-towels-37337846?utm_source=RSS&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Category%2FChannel%3A+main)
*Вышел первый трейлер новых «Охотников за привидениями»*

Культовая франшиза становится более масштабной и разрушительной.
[Read more...](https://lifehacker.ru/trejler-novyx-oxotnikov-za-privideniyami/)
*You could lose access to a key feature if you buy an electric car*

Electric cars come with a few downsides, including those that involve range, charging and other adjustments to a driver's way of life. However, due to the built-in technical issues of EVs, certain adjustments might become more drastic in the years to come.Related: Ex-Ford CEO warns of fierce challenge ahead for electric vehicles A new report by the Center for Automotive Research and the Alliance for Automotive Innovation (CAR) found that keeping AM radio in new vehicles, especially EVs, could cost automakers billions of dollars by the end of the decade. According to the report, automakers could face a cumulative cost of up to $3.8 billion to address the problem of electromagnetic interference that can distort AM radio signals in EVs. Automakers have not been able to completely eliminate said interference, but they have found ways to reduce it by shielding cables, installing interference filters and active noise cancellation, as well as strategically placing components to act as a physical shield against interference. Tesla Model 3 interior Sjoerd van der Wal/Getty Images However, these added components add weight to the vehicle, affecting both battery range and the cost to the consumer. One manufacturer told CAR researchers that said cable shielding to cost between $35-$50 per car and interference filters to cost an extra $15-$20. Though these do sound like small numbers, the large scale that many automakers plan to produce EVs at will makes this an expensive compromise, and as a result, CAR researchers recommend removing AM radios in future and providing buyers with "alternative products for in-vehicle audio content." More Business of EVs:A full list of EVs and hybrids that qualify for federal tax creditsHere’s why EV experts are flaming Joe Biden’s car policyThe EV industry is facing an unusual new problem This news comes as a bipartisan effort in Congress called the AM Radio for Every Vehicle Act has made waves on the hill. This bill would direct the U.S. Transportation Department to issue a rule requiring automakers to keep AM radio receivers in new vehicles as standard equipment. Currently, at least seven manufacturers - BMW BMWYY, Mazda MZDAF, Polestar, Rivian RIVN, Tesla TSLA, Volkswagen VLKAF and Volvo, do not offer AM radio in their EVs because of electromagnetic interference that can affect the reception of AM radio signals. Get investment guidance from trusted portfolio managers without the management fees. Sign up for Action Alerts PLUS now.
[Read more...](https://www.thestreet.com/electric-vehicles/am-radio-electric-cars)
You could lose access to a key feature if you buy an electric car

Electric cars come with a few downsides, including those that involve range, charging and other adjustments to a driver's way of life. However, due to the built-in technical issues of EVs, certain adjustments might become more drastic in the years to come.Related: Ex-Ford CEO warns of fierce challenge ahead for electric vehicles A new report by the Center for Automotive Research and the Alliance for Automotive Innovation (CAR) found that keeping AM radio in new vehicles, especially EVs, could cost automakers billions of dollars by the end of the decade. According to the report, automakers could face a cumulative cost of up to $3.8 billion to address the problem of electromagnetic interference that can distort AM radio signals in EVs. Automakers have not been able to completely eliminate said interference, but they have found ways to reduce it by shielding cables, installing interference filters and active noise cancellation, as well as strategically placing components to act as a physical shield against interference. Tesla Model 3 interior Sjoerd van der Wal/Getty Images However, these added components add weight to the vehicle, affecting both battery range and the cost to the consumer. One manufacturer told CAR researchers that said cable shielding to cost between $35-$50 per car and interference filters to cost an extra $15-$20. Though these do sound like small numbers, the large scale that many automakers plan to produce EVs at will makes this an expensive compromise, and as a result, CAR researchers recommend removing AM radios in future and providing buyers with "alternative products for in-vehicle audio content." More Business of EVs:A full list of EVs and hybrids that qualify for federal tax creditsHere’s why EV experts are flaming Joe Biden’s car policyThe EV industry is facing an unusual new problem This news comes as a bipartisan effort in Congress called the AM Radio for Every Vehicle Act has made waves on the hill. This bill would direct the U.S. Transportation Department to issue a rule requiring automakers to keep AM radio receivers in new vehicles as standard equipment. Currently, at least seven manufacturers - BMW BMWYY, Mazda MZDAF, Polestar, Rivian RIVN, Tesla TSLA, Volkswagen VLKAF and Volvo, do not offer AM radio in their EVs because of electromagnetic interference that can affect the reception of AM radio signals. Get investment guidance from trusted portfolio managers without the management fees. Sign up for Action Alerts PLUS now.
Read more...
*KFC brings back its most outrageous deep-fried item for Thanksgiving*

On Thanksgiving, there are those who spend hours sweating in the kitchen over a turkey and those who avoid all the stress and go out for a restaurant meal instead. Over the last five years, there has also been an emerging fast-food option as more and more chains launch their version of the holiday bird.Related: Thanksgiving Turkey (the Whole Thing) From Popeyes Returns Restaurant Brands International QSR-owned Popeyes has been serving its Cajun-Style Turkey — a full-sized bird marinated in the Southern-style chain’s signature spice blend and delivered in a sealed vacuum wrap to quickly heat up at home — for the last 22 years since 2001. KFC offers a Cajun Deep Fried Turkey meal for Thanksgiving. Yum! Brands This how you can get your hands on a KFC Cajun Deep Fried Turkey While launched significantly later in 2013, Yum! Brands YUM chain KFC‘s Cajun Deep Fried Turkey has also been around for a long time and is making another return this holiday season in select states. More Food + Dining:Taco Bell menu tries new take on an American classicMcDonald's menu goes big, brings back fan favorites (with a catch)The 10 best food stocks to buy now Ranging between 14 and 16 pounds, the bird is what KFC describes as “tender, juicy, and deliciously prepared in our classic KFC style” and will be available to order in California, Utah, Colorado and Washington State for a starting price of $69.99. Those who want to order a full Thanksgiving spread can get the Holiday Meal for $99.99 or a the Holiday Feast for $109.99 — the Holiday Meal features the bird alongside sides such as family-size mashed potatoes, gravy, coleslaw and a dozen biscuits while the Holiday Feast also has additional sides such as macaroni & cheese, sweet corn and chocolate cake. Those who want this bird at their home will need to pre-order it at least a week in advance (preferably earlier since they have sold out early in last years) and then pick it up at a participating store on Thanksgiving morning. While already cooked, the birds needed to be reheated at 165°F and are meant to feed up to 12 people.What’s in that Cajun sauce? The mystery remains Despite the heavy inflation we’ve seen over the last few years, ordering the turkey in 2023 does not cost much more than the $59.99 it did back in 2013. (The spreads have, however, gone up in price.) During the decade that passed, KFC has also stayed largely mum around what exactly makes up the “Cajun” part of it beyond it being on the spicier side. “Cajun, however, is hard to pin down; it's difficult to burn a fried turkey,” writers for SF Weekly wrote when the Deep Fried Cajun Turkey first came out in 2013. “The contents of the ‘Cajun sauce,’ while not guarded with the fervor of the Colonel's 11 secret herbs and spices, are not known to even 20-year KFC personnel we spoke with. In the end, the best Cajun qualifier we could elicit is ‘it's got a little kick to it.’” One of the managers at a KFC store that served the bird also told SF Weekly that the reason it ran out so fast was because they were too large to keep in large quantities at a single store. “Have you seen my store?” Douglas Speigel told the news outlet. “We're narrow. That's why I only ordered 24.”
[Read more...](https://www.thestreet.com/restaurants/does-kfc-have-deep-fried-turkey-thanksgiving)
KFC brings back its most outrageous deep-fried item for Thanksgiving

On Thanksgiving, there are those who spend hours sweating in the kitchen over a turkey and those who avoid all the stress and go out for a restaurant meal instead. Over the last five years, there has also been an emerging fast-food option as more and more chains launch their version of the holiday bird.Related: Thanksgiving Turkey (the Whole Thing) From Popeyes Returns Restaurant Brands International QSR-owned Popeyes has been serving its Cajun-Style Turkey — a full-sized bird marinated in the Southern-style chain’s signature spice blend and delivered in a sealed vacuum wrap to quickly heat up at home — for the last 22 years since 2001. KFC offers a Cajun Deep Fried Turkey meal for Thanksgiving. Yum! Brands This how you can get your hands on a KFC Cajun Deep Fried Turkey While launched significantly later in 2013, Yum! Brands YUM chain KFC‘s Cajun Deep Fried Turkey has also been around for a long time and is making another return this holiday season in select states. More Food + Dining:Taco Bell menu tries new take on an American classicMcDonald's menu goes big, brings back fan favorites (with a catch)The 10 best food stocks to buy now Ranging between 14 and 16 pounds, the bird is what KFC describes as “tender, juicy, and deliciously prepared in our classic KFC style” and will be available to order in California, Utah, Colorado and Washington State for a starting price of $69.99. Those who want to order a full Thanksgiving spread can get the Holiday Meal for $99.99 or a the Holiday Feast for $109.99 — the Holiday Meal features the bird alongside sides such as family-size mashed potatoes, gravy, coleslaw and a dozen biscuits while the Holiday Feast also has additional sides such as macaroni & cheese, sweet corn and chocolate cake. Those who want this bird at their home will need to pre-order it at least a week in advance (preferably earlier since they have sold out early in last years) and then pick it up at a participating store on Thanksgiving morning. While already cooked, the birds needed to be reheated at 165°F and are meant to feed up to 12 people.What’s in that Cajun sauce? The mystery remains Despite the heavy inflation we’ve seen over the last few years, ordering the turkey in 2023 does not cost much more than the $59.99 it did back in 2013. (The spreads have, however, gone up in price.) During the decade that passed, KFC has also stayed largely mum around what exactly makes up the “Cajun” part of it beyond it being on the spicier side. “Cajun, however, is hard to pin down; it's difficult to burn a fried turkey,” writers for SF Weekly wrote when the Deep Fried Cajun Turkey first came out in 2013. “The contents of the ‘Cajun sauce,’ while not guarded with the fervor of the Colonel's 11 secret herbs and spices, are not known to even 20-year KFC personnel we spoke with. In the end, the best Cajun qualifier we could elicit is ‘it's got a little kick to it.’” One of the managers at a KFC store that served the bird also told SF Weekly that the reason it ran out so fast was because they were too large to keep in large quantities at a single store. “Have you seen my store?” Douglas Speigel told the news outlet. “We're narrow. That's why I only ordered 24.”
Read more...
*This Home Is Eclectic and Experimental, But Not Quite Maximalist*

See inside this four-bedroom North Carolina house that’s eclectic and colorful but not quite maximalist. READ MORE...
[Read more...](https://www.apartmenttherapy.com/colorful-durham-house-photos-37335763?utm_source=RSS&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Category%2FChannel%3A+main)
*Зачем смотреть «Объяснялкиных» — взрослый российский мультсериал от Сыендука*

Кажется, у нас появилась своя версия «Симпсонов» — познавательная, но более ограниченная.
[Read more...](https://lifehacker.ru/obyasnyalkiny/)
*I Tried Our Place’s Game-Changing 6-in-1 Air Fryer Oven, and It’s Now My Go-To for Easy, Fast Meal Prep (Bonus: It’s on Sale)*

The 6-in-1 appliance is perfect for my tiny apartment. READ MORE...
[Read more...](https://www.apartmenttherapy.com/our-place-wonder-oven-review-37338083?utm_source=RSS&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Category%2FChannel%3A+main)
*Why three popular pickup trucks are not as safe as you think*

Like large SUVs, full-size pickup trucks are a very popular choice for personal runabouts and family vehicles due to their aggressive styling and gargantuan size, the latter of which gives buyers a sense of safety in the event of an accident. Related: This popular car accessory could kill you, according to Federal regulators However, as trucks like Ford's F F-150, Stellantis' STLA Ram 1500 and General Motors' GM Chevrolet Silverado become some of the best-selling vehicles year after year, the latest crash tests show some bad news for the popular vehicles. In the latest crash safety tests conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, the Chevrolet Silverado, Ford F-150 and Ram 1500 have received "Poor" ratings in the updated moderate overlap front test, which has been updated to emphasize the safety of rear seat passengers. View the original article to see embedded media. According to the IIHS, the updated tests were put in place last year after research has shown that the risk of fatal injuries is higher for occupants in the backseat than for the driver and front seat passengers because of improved airbags and advanced seat belts that are not usually made available in the back. In this test, a second dummy "the size of a small woman or 12-year-old child" sits behind in the backseat behind the driver's seat, where a dummy "the size of an average adult man" is positioned. The Institute says that for a vehicle to earn a "good" rating, the second row dummy cannot record an excessive risk of injury to its head, neck, chest to thigh, as well as remaining correctly positioned during the crash without submarining, or sliding under the seatbelt due to being unrestrained — which can increase the risk of abdominal injuries. According to their results, the Chevy, Ford and Ram received poor results overall due to "inadequate restraint systems" in the rear of the three trucks. Data taken from their rear dummies showed that chest and head or neck injuries would be likely in the F-150 and Ram 1500, while the Silverado had lesser, but still excessive risk. More Technology:The company behind ChatGPT is now facing a massive lawsuitProminent EV company says latest deal will be the first of manyApple makes a big new move with Elon Musk's Twitter “Like most other vehicle classes, large pickups don’t perform as well in the new moderate overlap evaluation as they do in the updated side test, which is now a requirement for our Top Safety Pick awards,” said IIHS President David Harkey. Both the Ford F-150 and Ram 1500 previously earned IIHS Top Safety Pick awards in 2022. Get investment guidance from trusted portfolio managers without the management fees. Sign up for Action Alerts PLUS now.
[Read more...](https://www.thestreet.com/automotive/why-three-popular-pickup-trucks-are-not-as-safe-as-you-think-)
Why three popular pickup trucks are not as safe as you think

Like large SUVs, full-size pickup trucks are a very popular choice for personal runabouts and family vehicles due to their aggressive styling and gargantuan size, the latter of which gives buyers a sense of safety in the event of an accident. Related: This popular car accessory could kill you, according to Federal regulators However, as trucks like Ford's F F-150, Stellantis' STLA Ram 1500 and General Motors' GM Chevrolet Silverado become some of the best-selling vehicles year after year, the latest crash tests show some bad news for the popular vehicles. In the latest crash safety tests conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, the Chevrolet Silverado, Ford F-150 and Ram 1500 have received "Poor" ratings in the updated moderate overlap front test, which has been updated to emphasize the safety of rear seat passengers. View the original article to see embedded media. According to the IIHS, the updated tests were put in place last year after research has shown that the risk of fatal injuries is higher for occupants in the backseat than for the driver and front seat passengers because of improved airbags and advanced seat belts that are not usually made available in the back. In this test, a second dummy "the size of a small woman or 12-year-old child" sits behind in the backseat behind the driver's seat, where a dummy "the size of an average adult man" is positioned. The Institute says that for a vehicle to earn a "good" rating, the second row dummy cannot record an excessive risk of injury to its head, neck, chest to thigh, as well as remaining correctly positioned during the crash without submarining, or sliding under the seatbelt due to being unrestrained — which can increase the risk of abdominal injuries. According to their results, the Chevy, Ford and Ram received poor results overall due to "inadequate restraint systems" in the rear of the three trucks. Data taken from their rear dummies showed that chest and head or neck injuries would be likely in the F-150 and Ram 1500, while the Silverado had lesser, but still excessive risk. More Technology:The company behind ChatGPT is now facing a massive lawsuitProminent EV company says latest deal will be the first of manyApple makes a big new move with Elon Musk's Twitter “Like most other vehicle classes, large pickups don’t perform as well in the new moderate overlap evaluation as they do in the updated side test, which is now a requirement for our Top Safety Pick awards,” said IIHS President David Harkey. Both the Ford F-150 and Ram 1500 previously earned IIHS Top Safety Pick awards in 2022. Get investment guidance from trusted portfolio managers without the management fees. Sign up for Action Alerts PLUS now.
Read more...