DrProxy.me | WarpVPN.net | DR Proxy Channel
Other customer
You need only one.
I see. I will move public proxies clusters to other location soon.
Personal proxy is ok now.
Personal proxy is ok now.
Forwarded from DrProxy.me | WarpVPN.net | DR Proxy Channel
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Personal proxy - realy high speed and secure.
buy - $1.5 in BTC, webmoney, perfect money voucher to @DrProxyProSupport
personal proxy download test ☝🏻
Now you can echange Iran real to webmoney.
personal proxy price: $2 = 16600 Toman
Sales: @DrProxyProSupport
Now you can echange Iran real to webmoney.
personal proxy price: $2 = 16600 Toman
Sales: @DrProxyProSupport
preventive replacement of personal proxy addresses on the fly is completed.
service continues to work.
service continues to work.
- The Russian Foreign Ministry's channel is still active in the telegram, which is blocked on the territory of the Russian Federation by a court decision. Why?
- I do not see any contradiction here. The court's decision was about what?
- About blocking Telegram.
- Correctly. About blocking the platform itself, but not the channels. We consulted with Roskomnadzor and got all the necessary explanations in this regard. The ban does not extend to work in Telegram itself.
- That is, state bodies have the right to be present in Telegram, despite the fact that the messenger in Russia itself is banned?
- Did the court decision say anything else?
- I'm confused.
- I'll draw an analogy. So the court decided to close the store. So? But people continue to approach, and the store itself also works. The court decision does not say that people should not go in and buy something there if the store is not closed?
- I do not see any contradiction here. The court's decision was about what?
- About blocking Telegram.
- Correctly. About blocking the platform itself, but not the channels. We consulted with Roskomnadzor and got all the necessary explanations in this regard. The ban does not extend to work in Telegram itself.
- That is, state bodies have the right to be present in Telegram, despite the fact that the messenger in Russia itself is banned?
- Did the court decision say anything else?
- I'm confused.
- I'll draw an analogy. So the court decided to close the store. So? But people continue to approach, and the store itself also works. The court decision does not say that people should not go in and buy something there if the store is not closed?
Forwarded from Эшер II. A+
https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3690055 МИД хочет и будет пользоваться Telegram. Как тебе такое, Роскомнадзор?